Behind Dior’s Feminist Wave: The Legacy of Rachele Regini

by Thea Elle | Jul 31, 2025 | Arts & Culture

Style Companion

Behind Dior’s Feminist Wave: The Legacy of Rachele Regini

by Thea Elle | Aug., 01, 2025 | Arts & Culture

When Maria Grazia Chiuri became DIOR’s first female creative director in 2016, she didn’t just change how the maison dressed women—she changed how it spoke to them. Her collections featured slogan tees, goddess silhouettes, and bold female symbolism. But while Chiuri became the public face of feminist fashion at DIOR, there was another voice helping shape the message from behind the scenes: her daughter, Rachele Regini.

Rarely photographed and barely quoted, Regini worked quietly as DIOR’s cultural advisor. But her influence was anything but minor. With an academic background in gender studies and a sharp eye for cultural storytelling, she helped steer the brand’s most thoughtful collaborations and feminist narratives. As Chiuri steps down, the question isn’t just who will replace her on the runway—but who, if anyone, will continue the vision she and Regini built together.

She Brought Vision, Not Just Style, to DIOR

Maria Grazia Chiuri didn’t just break DIOR’s glass ceiling — she embroidered a manifesto on it. Born in Rome in 1964 to a seamstress mother, Chiuri grew up with fashion as a second language. After studying at the Istituto Europeo di Design, she cut her teeth at FENDI, where she helped launch the now-iconic Baguette bag, and later at Valentino, co-leading a dreamy, lace-drenched revival with Pierpaolo Piccioli. But it was her 2016 appointment as DIOR’s first-ever female creative director that turned her into something more than a designer. From the moment her models walked out in “We Should All Be Feminists” tees, Chiuri made it clear: she wasn’t just dressing women — she was talking to them.

Her collections at DIOR weren’t just about silhouettes, but signals. She pulled from female artists, thinkers, and dancers, infusing haute couture with protest posters and poetry. Not everyone loved it. Some called it performative, others praised it as overdue. But Chiuri’s point was less about being universally liked and more about being unmistakably heard. Fashion, under her direction, became a medium for dialogue — one that asked who gets to define femininity, power, and beauty. And though she stood at the front of the house, she wasn’t doing the thinking alone. Just behind the scenes was her daughter, Rachele Regini — not only a quiet influence, but DIOR’s official cultural adviser. And her fingerprint is all over the brand’s most ideological turns.

If you’re a luxury brand enthusiast on a budget, check out CRIS & COCO! You will only find better deals, with up to 90% off on authentic, high-quality products. Trust our quality satisfaction guarantee and 99 % satisfied customers since 2018 speak for themselves. Take advantage of this hidden gem!

The Shirt Heard Around the World

In her very first show for DIOR, Maria Grazia Chiuri didn’t just introduce a new silhouette — she introduced a stance. The Spring/Summer 2017 collection opened with structured fencing jackets and ethereal sheer skirts, nodding to strength and softness in equal measure. But it was a simple white cotton T-shirt that captured the world’s attention. Emblazoned with the now-iconic phrase “We Should All Be Feminists,” borrowed from writer Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, the shirt became an instant headline-maker. It wasn’t just fashion; it was a declaration. A manifesto disguised as merch. And in the rarefied world of haute couture, it was a radical move — a luxury house embracing slogan-wear not as a moment of irony or rebellion, but as a clear ideological stance.

Critics were quick to weigh in. Was it a bold statement or a branding exercise? A genuine call for change or just savvy marketing cloaked in activism? But Chiuri stood firm. For her, the message wasn’t about wrapping politics in tulle — it was about planting ideas in the cultural conversation, using fashion as a vehicle for discourse. She knew that a runway show couldn’t dismantle patriarchy, but it could nudge the industry — and its audience — in a new direction. The shirt sold out almost instantly. The quote went viral. And DIOR, once synonymous with cinched waists and post-war femininity, found itself pulsing with contemporary relevance.

SHOP CRIS & COCO

Maria Grazia Chiuri brought depth to DIOR’s runways, blending bold fashion with meaningful messages.

From Catwalk to Consciousness

If the T-shirt sparked the conversation, the Divine Feminine set made sure we stayed in it. For DIOR’s Spring 2020 couture show, Chiuri teamed up with legendary feminist artist Judy Chicago to create a runway installation that felt more like a temple than a tent. Held at the Musée Rodin, the show took place inside a soaring, womb-like structure stitched from fabric and filled with embroidered banners asking pointed questions like, “What if women ruled the world?” Subtle? Not even close. Effective? Absolutely.

Models walked through the space like priestesses, draped in goddess gowns and power silks. But the real power came from the messaging: Chiuri wasn’t just decorating the runway — she was using it as a platform for institutional critique. In a world where “feminist fashion” often stops at a screen-printed slogan, this was high-concept, high-effort, and unapologetically cerebral. It was the rare couture show where you walked away thinking less about the price tags and more about the patriarchy. That alone felt revolutionary.

At DIOR, Maria Grazia Chiuri reimagined the runway as a place for modern elegance and forward-thinking design.

More Than a Moodboard: The Legacy They Built

What made Chiuri’s feminism at DIOR more than a passing trend was how deeply — and consistently — it was woven into the brand’s identity. This wasn’t about one season’s theme. It was about reshaping the maison’s core values. Year after year, show after show, Chiuri made it clear that beauty and brains weren’t mutually exclusive. Under her direction, DIOR stopped selling just clothes and started selling a point of view — one that challenged who fashion is for, what it can say, and how it can mean more.

Behind that intellectual sharpness was Rachele Regini, whose influence helped give Chiuri’s feminism not just visibility, but teeth. Together, they formed an unlikely but quietly radical duo: a designer-mother with power on the runway, and a theorist-daughter shaping the ideas behind it. While other brands were still testing the waters with #empowerment, DIOR made it policy. And whether or not every slogan landed, the message was loud and clear — this house was no longer dressing women just for the male gaze. It was dressing them for themselves.

After Chiuri. What Happens to a Feminist House Without Its Feminist?

As Chiuri prepares to step down from DIOR, the question is not just who will fill her shoes. It is whether anyone will carry the same conviction. For all the critiques of her sometimes literal approach to feminism, Chiuri gave the brand a heartbeat. She expanded the definition of power dressing. She made intellect part of the aesthetic. And she proved that a major luxury house could take a stand, even if it made people uncomfortable.

What happens now? Rumors swirl about her next move. Could it be her own label? A return to VALENTINO? Something completely unexpected? And what about Rachele Regini, the quiet force behind the messaging? Her next chapter may not be in design, but her impact on fashion discourse is just beginning. As for DIOR, the brand faces a choice. Keep the feminism baked in, or treat it like a passing trend. Either way, the bar has been raised. The runway will not forget what Chiuri built. And neither will the women who finally felt seen while walking it.

Chiuri’s DIOR runways blended mythic beauty with intellectual edge, where every look carried both style and a statement.

The Final Stitch

Maria Grazia Chiuri didn’t just make clothes. She made a case. That a luxury house could have values. That fashion could be political without losing its beauty. That femininity could be strong, sharp, and self-defined. With Rachele Regini helping shape the message, DIOR became more than a label. It became a lens.

Whether the next era of DIOR will double down or backtrack remains to be seen. But one thing is clear. Chiuri did not whisper her point of view. She embroidered it. Now the industry has to decide if it will keep listening, or simply move on to the next trend.

Looking to indulge in luxury brands without breaking the bank?

Shop here

Owning Less Isn’t Minimalism. It’s Self-Defense.

by Thea Elle | Jul 28, 2025 | Luxury Industrial Complex

Style Companion

Owning Less Isn’t Minimalism. It’s Self-Defense.

by Thea Elle | Jul., 28, 2025 | Luxury Industrial Complex

No one really needs another bag. But the scroll says otherwise. A tote for your errands, a mini for your evenings, something quilted just because. The algorithm always knows what you almost want. Somewhere between the last drop and the next, consumption turned into routine. But owning less isn’t about austerity. It’s about self-respect. It’s the quiet decision to choose clarity over chaos. One exceptional bag that fits your life, your style, and your standards can do what five trend pieces never will. In a world wired for more, the smartest move is knowing when to stop. Not because you have to. But because you can.

When the noise fades, clarity carries through. One bag. No hype. Just the quiet power of enough.

The Bag That Reminds You Who You Are

There comes a moment when shopping stops feeling exciting and starts feeling noisy. You scroll past ads that somehow echo the exact thought you had earlier that day. You try on pieces that promise confidence but end up adding more clutter. Everything begins to blur together. Fast drops. Loud trends. Things you thought you wanted but never actually needed.

Then one thing cuts through. Not because it shouts, but because it fits. Not just your outfit, but your life. A well-made bag with structure and purpose. The kind that asks nothing from you but still gives something back. It rests on your shoulder and somehow your mind quiets too. You stop chasing the next thing. You stop performing taste. You feel like yourself, only more certain. That feeling does not come from having more. It comes from choosing better. From trusting your eye over the algorithm. From liking what you like and not needing validation. When something fits that naturally, you carry more than your essentials. You carry a reminder that enough is not just plenty. It is powerful.

Minimalism isn’t about having nothing. It’s about having what truly reflects you—and letting the rest go.

The Point Is Not to Own Nothing

Minimalism gets a bad reputation. People hear the word and picture an empty apartment, a single plate, a wardrobe in fifty shades of oatmeal. But that is not the point. The goal is not to drain your life of color or joy. The goal is to stop confusing excess with expression. We are told that more options mean more personality, but often it just means more noise. When every new trend starts to look the same, real taste becomes knowing when to stop adding and start editing. Owning less is not about denying yourself. It is about making room for clarity. When your closet is full of pieces you bought on impulse or out of pressure, it becomes hard to even see what you like. But when you choose with intention, something changes. You shop slower. You get pickier. You notice how often the loudest items are the ones you wear the least. You start to understand your style as a reflection of yourself, not a reflection of the feed.

Intentional shopping is not boring. It is bold. It means asking yourself what you actually want instead of what you are told to want. You stop performing taste and start living it. That shift is not just practical. It is personal. Because when your wardrobe is full of pieces that feel aligned with who you are—not who the internet says you should be—you walk through the world with more ease, more confidence, and less regret.

SHOP CRIS & COCO

Style that stays. Pieces that matter beyond the feed. Because the best looks aren’t made for the scroll—they’re made for real life.

Style That Outlives the Scroll

The algorithm does not care about your closet. It just wants your attention. So it keeps feeding you outfits that work for one photo, one trip, one month. Most trends are designed to expire. The trick is learning to want what will still matter after the feed moves on. That is where intention becomes power. When you stop chasing novelty, you gain clarity. You begin to buy less, but better. Not just because it is stylish, but because it makes sense. A heel you can dance in. A jacket that works in real life. A bag that holds what you need and nothing more. These are not compromises. They are choices. And they are available to more people than ever.

Second-hand luxury has made owning well-crafted pieces more possible. You do not need a limitless budget to access real quality. What you do need is confidence and a little know-how. Platforms are expanding, resale has gone mainstream, and price is no longer the only barrier. You do not need to buy new to buy beautifully. And you do not need to buy constantly to have style. In fact, the less you chase, the more grounded your wardrobe becomes. That is not about status. That is about freedom.

You don’t need more. You need what matters. Fewer pieces. Deeper impact. Style that supports your life—not distracts from it.

Fewer Things, Greater Impact

You do not need more things. You need the right things. The ones that carry weight, not just in your hand, but in your day. When you stop buying on impulse and start choosing with intention, your style begins to reflect your values, not the mood of the feed. You are no longer chasing approval or performing an identity. You are expressing one you actually believe in.

Great design is not about having more. It is about knowing what belongs and why. A thoughtfully made bag that moves from morning to midnight. A pair of shoes that outlast trends. A jacket that works when everything else in your day does not. These are not just items. They are anchors. They support your life rather than distract from it. The real luxury is not a closet full of options. It is a wardrobe made of clarity, confidence, and calm. To want less is not to lack ambition. It is to redefine success on your own terms. And to choose better is not to settle. It is to decide, with care, what deserves to come with you.

Looking to indulge in luxury brands without breaking the bank?

Shop here

The Price Tag Is the Point: Why Luxury Bags and Water Bottles Are Designed to Provoke

by Thea Elle | Jul 26, 2025 | Luxury Industrial Complex

Style Companion

The Price Tag Is the Point: Why Luxury Bags and Water Bottles Are Designed to Provoke

by Thea Elle | Jul., 27, 2025 | Luxury Industrial Complex

It’s not about hydration or storage. It’s about status in a bottle or a bag. Whether it’s a Stanley cup in a limited-edition hue or a designer tote that costs more than your monthly income, luxury knows exactly what it’s doing. The more ridiculous the price, the louder the discourse. Outrage fuels visibility. Instagram handles the rest. These products aren’t designed to be practical. They’re designed to be provocative, and like clockwork, we always take the bait.

Hydration and handbags have become conversation starters. These are not practical items. They are provocations disguised as products, designed to stir outrage and spark envy with every scroll.

Outrage Is a Feature, Not a Flaw

Luxury fashion has always trafficked in fantasy, but lately it feels like it’s selling something closer to provocation. The latest marketing strategies aren’t built around elegance or heritage. They are designed to go viral. A $6,000 handbag that resembles a grocery tote or a stainless steel water bottle priced like a week in Saint-Tropez isn’t a design oversight. It is a calculated move. These products are not made to blend into daily life. They are made to disrupt it, to become conversation pieces before they even reach a checkout page.

In this economy of attention, nothing fuels relevance like a public outcry. What looks like bad taste or tone-deaf pricing is often a deliberate attempt to dominate the algorithm. The memes, the social media takedowns, the incredulous headlines—each one acts as unpaid advertising. The goal is not universal admiration, but cultural saturation. If people are talking, sharing, and fuming, then the item has done its job. Outrage becomes a kind of currency, and for luxury brands, it pays.

It looks like a grocery bag, costs more than rent, and everyone’s talking. Mission accomplished.

The Art of Expensive Absurdity

Luxury handbags have perfected a formula where exclusivity meets irrationality. A five-figure price tag is no longer just a marker of materials or craftsmanship. It’s a flex of senseless spending—a wink to those in the know that what you’re really buying is cultural capital. The more impractical or ridiculous the design, the more power it holds. A tote that looks like a paper shopping bag? Iconic. A clutch that can’t fit your phone? Even better.

Brands understand that logic is irrelevant in this space. In fact, the less sense it makes, the more desirable it becomes. That’s the allure. These bags are meant to confound, to raise eyebrows, to spark headlines. It’s a performance of wealth so brazen it dares you to question it—and then rewards you for being part of the spectacle. The price tag isn’t a barrier. It’s the bait.

SHOP CRIS & COCO

When the Joke Becomes the Dress Code

To the casual observer, a $3,000 bag shaped like a lunchbox or a monogrammed water bottle with its own leather holster seems like satire. It reads as a gag product—something cooked up for a runway stunt or a fashion week meme. But on social media, where aesthetics move faster than context, the absurd quickly transforms into aspiration. Once an item is framed in the right light, with the right face and caption, irony dissolves. What was once a punchline becomes a purchase.

Immersed in the infinite scroll of curated feeds and unboxing videos, even the most ridiculous items start to feel inevitable. Influencers stage them as lifestyle choices, not luxuries. Comment sections echo with approval. The repetition breeds familiarity, and before long, owning a $600 cup or a thousand-dollar microbag feels less like indulgence and more like participation. The spectacle isn’t just tolerated—it’s the point.

When a $6,000 grocery bag makes headlines, it’s not a blunder—it’s branding. In luxury today, outrage isn’t accidental. It’s the point.

Fashion, But First a Flex

In luxury marketing today, being over the top is no longer a risk. It’s the plan. A handbag that looks like a crushed lunch bag or a purse too small to fit a lip balm might not be practical, but that’s not the point. These designs are made to grab attention, not necessarily to be used. On social media, the more unexpected something looks, the faster it spreads. It makes you wonder — is it good design or is it just a cry for attention?

Look at the Stanley Cup. What started as a practical water bottle has become a collector’s item thanks to TikTok. People now buy them in colors to match outfits, hunt for limited drops, and treat hydration like a fashion statement. Prada saw the moment and launched a nylon water bottle bag that costs more than most people’s monthly bills. It doesn’t need to be useful. It just needs to be seen. When a Stanley and a luxury bag can share the same spotlight, the goal isn’t function. It’s visibility.

Luxury has figured out the formula: price something absurdly, let the internet do the marketing.

The Scroll-Induced Trance

At some point, we stopped asking why. Why is a tiny leather triangle with a logo worth thousands? Why does a bottle holder need its own designer sling? Social media didn’t just normalize the absurd — it rewarded it. The more bizarre or illogical the item, the more likely it was to go viral. And we scrolled, liked, shared, and slowly started to believe that this was normal.

But maybe it’s time to snap out of it. Maybe we need to pause before we double-tap and ask what exactly we’re celebrating. Are we admiring good design or just chasing whatever the algorithm serves us? The trance is subtle. It makes luxury feel accessible when really, it’s just moved the goalposts. A water bottle isn’t just a water bottle. A bag isn’t just a bag. They’re props in a performance — and we’re all caught up in the show.

Nothing but the Tag

In the end, it’s not about the functionality or the design. It’s about the tag, the flex, the momentary thrill of owning something that others recognize — not for what it does, but for what it signals. A Stanley in a Prada sling doesn’t quench thirst. It quenches the need to be seen.

Luxury has always been about illusion, but now the illusion is crowd-sourced. The more outrageous the price or impractical the item, the more it fits into this new economy of attention. We laugh, we post, we click — and somewhere in that cycle, it sells out. Maybe the real design isn’t the product at all. Maybe it’s the strategy behind it. Maybe that’s the art. Or maybe it’s just a very expensive cry for attention.

Looking to indulge in luxury brands without breaking the bank?

Shop here

The Clean Girl of Luxury: Can Gucci Save the Planet in Patent Leather Pumps?

by Thea Elle | Jul 23, 2025 | Satire

Style Companion

The Clean Girl of Luxury: Can Gucci Save the Planet in Patent Leather Pumps?

It’s official: luxury has entered its Clean Girl era. You know the aesthetic—center-parted hair, minimalist makeup, and a “sustainably sourced” tote bag that looks virtuous until you check the care label. Fashion houses are leaning hard into this rebrand, churning out press releases loaded with promises of “net zero by 2030,” “radical transparency,” and “artisan empowerment” as if a few well-placed buzzwords can erase decades of extravagance. CEOs now pose solemnly beside potted saplings or mushroom leather prototypes, projecting the kind of corporate virtue that photographs well on LinkedIn. The narrative is clear: the same companies that once glorified exotic skins, gold hardware, and private jet runway tours have supposedly discovered their ethical core. But this is no moral awakening. It is a strategic exfoliation designed to buff away the rough patches of bad PR while leaving the machinery of hyper-growth untouched. Behind the mushroom totes and recycled cashmere hides the same industrial scale production chains that rely on layers of subcontractors and questionable oversight. Sustainability targets are still conveniently pegged to dates decades away, giving brands plenty of runway to maintain business as usual. This isn’t about saving the planet. It’s about saving face and selling virtue at a premium.

Green is the new black: mushroom leather, alpaca photo ops, and ‘radical transparency’ that ends with an Instagram caption.

Cozy sweaters, warm lattes, and the SAINT LAURENT Loulou—fall perfection in bag form.

The Illusion of “Ethical Consumption”

Luxury’s favorite sleight of hand is convincing us that ethics can be swiped with a credit card. The marketing is irresistible. Buy this bag and support women artisans. Buy these sneakers and help save the planet. Swipe up to plant a tree. The transactional nature of it all creates the comforting illusion that indulgence and activism are perfectly compatible. Never mind that these same brands are still churning out limited-edition keychains in four continents, flying them across oceans, and wrapping them in three layers of packaging. Consumers are fed a narrative where every purchase becomes a small act of resistance, and who wouldn’t want to feel virtuous while carrying a $4,000 tote?

Yet when you strip away the storytelling, the math does not add up. A line of handbags made from “recycled ocean plastic” is still part of a system built on endless production and relentless growth. The real question is not whether your new loafers are biodegradable but why any of us need a new pair at all. It is a question the industry refuses to ask, because the answer threatens the very engine of its existence. After all, if ethical consumption means consuming less, what happens to the business model of selling ever more?

Ethics for sale: swipe your card, plant a tree, carry a $4,000 tote, and call it activism.

If you’re a luxury brand enthusiast on a budget, check out CRIS & COCO! You will only find better deals, with up to 90% off on authentic, high-quality products. Trust our quality satisfaction guarantee and 99% satisfied customers since 2018 speak for themselves. Take advantage of this hidden gem!

When Greenwashing Becomes the Dress Code

If there is one thing luxury does flawlessly, it is aestheticizing responsibility. Sustainability has been turned into a design motif, woven into collections like a limited-edition monogram. Capsule lines arrive in muted earth tones, runway shows feature recycled plastic sets, and campaign videos show models cradling baby goats on regenerative farms. Meanwhile, the actual numbers—the emissions, the overproduction, the labor exploitation—are relegated to footnotes no one reads. It is less about changing systems and more about dressing up the status quo in eco-chic packaging.

This performative greening works because it caters to an audience that craves moral validation alongside their retail therapy. Owning a “sustainable” luxury item signals not just wealth but discernment, a kind of ethical superiority that looks good on Instagram. But make no mistake, the house still runs on the same turbocharged engines of growth and scale. The new uniform may be linen shirts and organic cotton dresses, but behind the scenes, it is business as usual—faster production cycles, global shipping networks, and a supply chain held together by opacity and subcontractors.

Shop CRIS & COCO. Up to 90% off retail. All iconic brands.

Eco chic on the runway business as usual behind the curtain

The Infinite Loop of “Limited Edition”

Luxury loves to talk about slowing down, yet somehow it keeps churning out “limited edition” collections at a speed that would make a fast-fashion brand blush. Seasonal drops, capsule collabs, anniversary reissues—each one hyped as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to buy less but better. In reality, they are carefully engineered scarcity plays designed to trigger panic buying, all while maintaining the illusion of restraint. The marketing is brilliant: exclusivity as a virtue, urgency as a lifestyle.

The irony? This strategy ensures nothing ever really feels rare. When every month brings a new “drop” and every influencer’s feed looks like a catalogue of the same eco-conscious logos, the extraordinary becomes routine. Luxury’s attempt to square its growth addiction with its sustainability PR reads less like innovation and more like a carefully choreographed juggling act. It is a spectacle that distracts from the simple truth that consuming less—not consuming differently—is the only thing that would truly make a difference.

Limited edition on repeat because nothing says sustainability like endless drops of must have scarcity.

The Real Luxury? Doing Less

Here’s an uncomfortable thought for the boardrooms of Paris and Milan: perhaps the ultimate luxury is not another limited-edition drop or a carbon-neutral delivery van but restraint. In an age of hyperproduction and hyperconsumption, doing less—and making less—feels radical. Imagine a world where a fashion house releases one perfect collection every few years, where a bag is actually rare because it isn’t churned out in factory-sized workshops. That is a kind of scarcity no marketing budget can manufacture.

But as long as shareholders demand perpetual growth and consumers demand perpetual novelty, the Clean Girl rebrand will remain just that—a rebrand. Luxury’s conscience, it seems, is as curated as its Instagram grid. Until the industry learns to trade quantity for quality, sustainability will stay what it too often is now: an accessory. And the planet does not need another accessory.

Looking to indulge in luxury brands without breaking the bank?

Shop CRIS & COCO here

Can Luxury Be Ethical at Scale? Dior’s Italian Scandal Reveals a Fragile System

by Thea Elle | Jul 22, 2025 | Arts & Culture, Luxury Industrial Complex

Style Companion

Can Luxury Be Ethical at Scale? Dior’s Italian Scandal Reveals a Fragile System

by Thea Elle | Jul., 22, 2025 | Luxury Industrial Complex

In Milan, the court’s ruling landed not with the crack of a gavel but with the soft thud of inevitability. Less than a year after placing DIOR’s Italian manufacturing arm under special administration for labor violations, judges declared the house reformed. The company, they noted approvingly, had “resolved relationships with at-risk suppliers extremely quickly” and “set a new benchmark for best practice.” In other words: problem solved. Crisis contained. DIOR is back to business as usual. Or so the official narrative would have us believe. Scratch beneath the judicial language and the carefully manicured corporate statements, however, and a more disquieting reality emerges—one that no amount of polished press releases, sustainability reports, or social media storytelling can fully obscure. This was never merely a DIOR problem. It was, and remains, a systemic flaw baked into the very architecture of modern luxury. A flaw born not of malice, but of scale. And it raises a question the industry has long tiptoed around: Can luxury ever be truly ethical when it operates as a globalized, billion-dollar business?

Dior wins back its freedom in Milan as the court ends oversight, but has luxury’s labor reckoning really begun?

Heritage vs. Hypergrowth

For much of the 20th century, luxury thrived on the illusion of scarcity and the reality of artisanal care. A HERMÈS Kelly or a DIOR Saddle wasn’t just an object; it was a talisman of craft, forged in hushed ateliers where generations of savoir-faire passed from master to apprentice like a sacred rite but in the era of conglomerate luxury—when names like LVMH, KERING, and RICHEMONT dominate the landscape—this ideal has been replaced by something far more pragmatic. Growth became the north star. Global retail footprints, Instagram-fueled demand spikes, and e-commerce platforms promising next-day delivery created a logistical behemoth of a supply chain.

DIOR, now firmly within the orbit of Bernard Arnault’s LVMH empire, was no exception. When Italian investigators uncovered that the brand’s leather goods unit had outsourced production to small, Chinese-owned subcontractors employing undocumented workers in precarious conditions, it wasn’t shocking so much as depressingly familiar. Prato, the Tuscan city at the heart of Italy’s fast-fashion and luxury manufacturing nexus, has for years been the locus of whispered scandals: cramped dormitories, 12-hour shifts, cash-in-hand wages. Luxury brands rarely deal directly with these workshops. Instead, a web of intermediaries insulates them from the messy realities on the ground. Until, of course, the web unravels under legal scrutiny. The Milan court praised DIOR for acting “extremely quickly” to sever ties with at-risk suppliers and overhaul its oversight systems. But how much of this speed was born of genuine cultural shift, and how much was simply the ruthless efficiency of a house that understands the cost of bad PR?

Once symbols of rarity and reverence, luxury icons like the HERMÈS Kelly and DIOR Saddle now orbit a global system obsessed with speed and scale.

When Ethics Meet Economics

To be fair, DIOR’s rapid response deserves recognition. In less than a year, the house rolled out supplier audits, compliance protocols, and what Milan’s judges lauded as “best practices.” On paper, the reforms signal a company eager to course-correct and fortify its ethical perimeter. But scratch the surface, and the deeper dilemma remains unresolved: how much ethical control can any luxury giant truly claim when it must feed a global appetite measured not in hundreds, but in hundreds of thousands? The uncomfortable answer? Not nearly enough. This is the bind at the heart of contemporary luxury. The industry has spent decades telling consumers that a monogrammed bag or a hand-stitched shoe is more than just a product—it is a vessel of heritage, a tangible link to centuries of savoir-faire, something scarce by design and precious by nature. Yet behind the gilded shop fronts and cinematic campaigns lies a supply chain that increasingly resembles fast fashion’s in scale and complexity.

Dana Thomas captured this contradiction in her prescient 2007 book Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster. She warned that democratizing luxury—flooding the world with logos and scaling production to match insatiable demand—would come at a cost. Not just to the aura of exclusivity that once defined these maisons, but to the invisible hands that stitch, dye, and assemble the goods.

SHOP CRIS & COCO

When everyone has it, is it still luxury? The smart money may be on brands that choose fewer bags, fewer stores, and fewer apologies.

Back to Business as Unusual

In its statement following the ruling, DIOR insisted it had “further strengthened its operations along the supply chain, setting a new benchmark for best practice in the industry.” The language is polished, the sentiment admirable. But it feels dangerously close to a ritualistic refrain—one we’ve heard from too many fashion houses caught with their ethical slip showing.

Because DIOR’s scandal was not an anomaly. It was part of a pattern. Giorgio Armani’s Italian unit was placed under similar special administration last year. Alviero Martini faced the same fate. Across the fashion capitals of Europe, from Florence to Paris, the industry’s most revered names have stumbled over the same tripwire: the impossibility of upholding artisanal standards at industrial scale. Luxury has long excelled at narrative. But narratives don’t stitch bags or audit suppliers.

Behind DIOR’s polished reforms lies the same question haunting all of luxury as it struggles to reconcile heritage with a supply chain built for fast fashion.

The Future: Smaller, Slower, Smarter?

So where does the industry go from here? If scale is the problem, perhaps the solution lies in rethinking scale itself. There are whispers of a countercurrent in the fashion world: niche ateliers refusing to expand beyond what their workshops can handle; brands prioritizing experience and storytelling over product proliferation; experiments in radical supply chain transparency. These are not yet the norm—but they might be luxury’s best chance at redemption.

Because as long as luxury tries to be everywhere—on every wrist, shoulder, and smartphone screen—it risks becoming ordinary. And once the extraordinary is lost, no amount of corporate contrition can buy it back.

DIOR calls its reforms a new benchmark for best practice but critics see a familiar script in luxury’s response to ethical lapses.

Behind DIOR’s polished reforms lies the same question haunting all of luxury as it struggles to reconcile heritage with a supply chain built for fast fashion.

Beyond Apologies: Building a New Paradigm

True reinvention will require more than improved audits or supplier codes of conduct. It will demand a cultural shift within an industry long addicted to quarterly growth. That means fewer seasonal drops, fewer logo-laden accessories churned out for mass appeal, and more investment in artisanship that cannot be replicated at industrial scale.

It may also mean relinquishing the illusion of endless accessibility. Luxury’s future might hinge not on reaching more consumers but on reawakening desire by pulling back. In an age where everything is instantly available, perhaps the ultimate luxury is restraint.

Looking to indulge in luxury brands without breaking the bank?

Shop here

« Older Entries

Next Entries »