
Style Companion
Let Them Eat Counterfeits: The Fashion House War on Resale Bags
by Thea Elle | August 5, 2025 | Style Guide
Luxury fashion has always had a selective memory. Brands once passed resale bags quietly through studio backdoors, handing them off to assistants, stylists, and friends of the house. These pieces were never meant for store shelves, but they were never meant to vanish either. Now, with resale markets thriving and consumer interest shifting, the same brands are attempting to rewrite history. CHANEL’s legal campaign against What Goes Around Comes Around is not a defense against fakes. It is an effort to gatekeep the afterlife of its products. Resale bags, once paraded in lookbooks and lent out for editorials, are now treated as contraband simply because they exist beyond the boutique’s control.

Timeless, But Only When Convenient
Luxury brands often claim to embody timelessness. Their marketing is soaked in language about legacy, permanence, and items that “hold their value” across generations. A CHANEL bag is not just a purchase, they claim, but a cultural artifact. The irony arrives when these same artifacts reappear in the wild—on resale platforms, in private collections, or the hands of independent sellers. The tone changes. What was once timeless is now suddenly unofficial, unauthenticated, or worse, unauthorized.
Resale bags are the clearest example of this hypocrisy. These pieces were made by the brand, used by the brand, and displayed proudly during their heyday. They appeared in editorials, backstage fittings, and showroom appointments. Now, stripped of their boutique setting, they are treated like knockoffs simply because they move outside the brand’s chosen ecosystem. It is not about protecting customers from fakes. It is about making sure the story—and the profit—stays in the hands of those who wrote the script.
Erasing the Archive
Resale bags are not just leftovers. They are living records of a collection’s process. Some show early hardware choices or colorways that never went into production. Others bear hand-finishing details that were later scaled back for retail. To pretend these pieces are meaningless once they leave the showroom is to pretend that fashion begins and ends at the cash register. It is not just short-sighted. It is revisionist.
When brands fight to erase these items from the market, they are not protecting design integrity. They are deleting history they no longer control. Resale bags are part of the creative footprint of a season. They are evidence of what the brand once valued and experimented with. Selling them does not damage the brand. It tells the full story. Who benefits from hiding that? And who loses when these pieces are stored or discarded?

The Circular Threat
Luxury brands have discovered the language of sustainability, but not the practice. Marketing teams now speak of circularity and environmental responsibility, yet the resale of Resale bags is often viewed as a threat, rather than a solution. These bags already exist. They require no new production, no additional materials, and no added carbon footprint. Refusing their resale is not about values. It is about optics and control.
The resale of Resale bags represents something many brands are not ready to accept. Consumers now define value for themselves. A buyer no longer needs a boutique associate or a runway show to tell them what matters. A Resale piece, once passed over by a showroom buyer, can become a prized object in the hands of someone who understands its rarity and beauty. This shift terrifies legacy houses. It means luxury is no longer dictated from the top. It is interpreted, revalued, and redistributed. That is not a threat to fashion. That is its future.

Protection or Performance?
Luxury brands frame their legal campaigns as efforts to protect consumers, but the narrative does not hold. The average buyer can tell the difference between a reseller and a CHANEL boutique. The concern is not confusion. It is a competition. When platforms and independent sellers gain traction, the brand loses control of pricing, access, and the story it tells about itself. Lawsuits are not being used to fight fraud. They are being used to protect the image and profit.
Consumer protection is important, but it should not become a pretext for erasing legitimate resale. When an authentic Resale bag is pulled from the market because it lacks a boutique receipt, who is being protected? Not the buyer, who is often more informed than the brand assumes. Not the seller, who takes on the risk of sourcing, verifying, and educating. The only party served is the brand, which continues to speak of legacy while working to erase its past.

The Smarter Luxury
Consumers are not powerless. They have more information, more access, and more influence than ever before. Still, many continue to believe that value only exists inside a boutique. A dust bag, a ribbon, a receipt from a flagship store. These are symbols, not substance. A Resale bag may not come with the full retail presentation, but it often carries something more meaningful. It holds the imprint of the design studio, the energy of a fashion season, and the marks of a process most customers never get to see.
Luxury has always been about storytelling. The boutique tells one version. Resale tells another. The difference is that resale allows for more honesty. Consumers have a choice. Ask what the item is, where it came from, and why it matters. A Resale piece can answer those questions with more depth than a mass-produced retail item ever could. Choosing resale is not about compromise. It is about clarity. And clarity, in a world built on image, is the real sign of taste.

A noir-tinted tribute to elegance: eveningwear infused with texture, movement, and couture precision—where every step tells a story in black and white.
Luxury Doesn’t Die, It Just Changes Hands
Resale is not the enemy of luxury. It is proof that luxury still matters. A Resale bag passed from one hand to another is not a threat. It is a continuation. Fashion was never meant to be frozen behind glass. It was made to move, to evolve, to be reinterpreted by people who wear it. The attempt to silence resale is not about protecting heritage. It is about avoiding accountability. Consumers should not only accept the secondhand market. They should defend it. It is one of the few places where fashion still tells the truth.